Yardi Resident Screening and TransUnion SmartMove are both well-regarded contenders in the screening space, and they solve different problems. Yardi fits teams already inside its platform that want screening in the leasing workflow, while SmartMove fits independent landlords who want a standalone report without software.
Both platforms pull solid screening data, and both stop at the same place. Yardi returns a recommendation, SmartMove returns a score and a report, and each one hands the final leasing decision back to a person. This article covers what each platform does, how they compare across 17 dimensions, their strengths and limits, how to choose, and the gaps neither one closes.
Yardi Resident Screening Overview
Yardi Resident Screening, marketed as ScreeningWorks Pro, is built into the Yardi Voyager and RentCafe leasing workflow and available to Yardi software subscribers rather than as a standalone service. Credit data comes from Equifax, with the Beacon score used to assess rental risk. Through its Nova Credit Cash Atlas integration, it runs cash-flow underwriting on verified bank data to evaluate credit-invisible applicants, and it uses Nova Credit Income Navigator for income verification.
Built-in checks flag Social Security and CPN fraud, and biometric matching compares document photos against a live selfie. From that data, Yardi calculates automated recommendations against each property's rent-to-income criteria to reduce manual leasing work. The output is a recommendation, not an automatic decision.
TransUnion Overview
TransUnion SmartMove delivers tenant screening reports directly from TransUnion, covering credit, criminal, and eviction history, with no software, subscription, or setup fees. At its center is ResidentScore, a risk score tuned for rental outcomes rather than a generic credit score. Signup happens online, and screening can begin within minutes, with most reports delivered the same day. Operators can pay for the screening themselves or use the renter-paid option, which shifts the cost onto the applicant.
That structure suits independent landlords and small operators who screen a few applicants at a time. Income Insights and identity verification are included in the SmartCheck Premium package at $48. The base SmartCheck Basic and SmartCheck Plus tiers do not include them, so depth depends on which package the operator selects. Like Yardi, SmartMove ends at a score and a report, leaving the leasing decision with the operator.
Yardi Screening vs SmartMove: Side-by-Side Comparison
The two platforms diverge across the dimensions that shape a leasing workflow, from credit source to automation to scalability. The table below maps 17 of them side by side. One split matters most: where Yardi returns a recommendation, and SmartMove returns a score, and neither returns a decision.
| Dimension |
Yardi Screening |
TransUnion SmartMove |
| 1. Core Purpose |
Embedded screening and recommendations inside a full property management system |
Standalone screening reports for individual leasing decisions |
| 2. Target Users |
Mid-to-large portfolios already on Yardi |
Independent landlords and small operators |
| 3. Screening Coverage |
Credit, criminal, eviction, income, fraud and ID checks |
Credit, criminal, and eviction |
| 4. Credit Data Source |
Equifax with Beacon score |
TransUnion |
| 5. Proprietary Risk Score |
Beacon-based rental risk |
ResidentScore, rental-specific |
| 6. Decisioning Capability |
Recommendation, not a decision |
Score and report, not a decision |
| 7. Income & Identity Verification |
Nova Credit Income Navigator and Cash Atlas, biometric ID match |
Income Insights and Identity Check included in Premium package only |
| 8. Fraud Prevention |
SSN and CPN fraud detection plus biometrics |
Standard identity verification within the report |
| 9. Degree of Automation |
Automated recommendations in-workflow |
Manual and report-driven |
| 10. Turnaround Time |
Within the Voyager workflow, no public SLA |
Most reports same day |
| 11. Standalone Availability |
No, requires Yardi software |
Yes, fully standalone |
| 12. PMS Dependency |
Requires Voyager or RentCafe |
None |
| 13. Portfolio Scalability |
Built for large multi-site portfolios with centralized analytics |
Best for low-volume or single-property use |
| 14. Renter Experience |
Applicant flows through RentCafe |
Applicant-facing invite with renter-paid option |
| 15. Compliance Features |
FCRA-aligned reporting and adverse-action support in-platform |
FCRA-compliant reports with adverse-action letters |
| 16. Pricing Model |
Bundled into the Yardi contract, not publicly listed |
Per-report, pay-as-you-go, renter-paid option |
| 17. Post-Lease Learning |
None |
None |
Yardi Screening vs SmartMove: Strengths and Limitations of Each Platform
Each platform is strong for the operator it was built for, and each carries a matching set of limits.
Where Yardi Screening Stands Out
- Fully Embedded in Voyager and RentCafe Leasing Workflows: Screening runs inside the system teams already use.
- Equifax Credit Data with Beacon Score for Rental Risk Assessment: The credit backbone is tuned to rental risk, not general credit.
- Cash Flow Underwriting via Nova Credit Cash Atlas for Credit-Invisible Applicants: Verified bank data evaluates applicants with no traditional credit file.
- Automated Screening Recommendations Reducing Manual Leasing Work: Recommendations calculate against each property's rent-to-income criteria.
- Scales Across Large Portfolios with Centralized Analytics: Multi-site operators get consistent, portfolio-level reporting.
Where Yardi Screening Falls Short
- Only Available to Yardi Software Subscribers, Not Standalone: Teams that do not run Yardi cannot buy it alone.
- Returns Recommendations, Not an Automatic Yes or No Decision: The platform advises, and the approval waits on a person.
- Manual Leasing Decision Still Required at Every Application: Every file passes back to staff for the final call.
- No Cross-Network Learning from Post-Lease Resident Outcomes: Criteria never adjust to how approved residents perform.
- Portfolio Access Requires Full Yardi Platform Investment: The screening depth is tied to a broader software commitment.
Where SmartMove Stands Out
- No Software Subscription or Setup Required: Operators screen without buying or configuring a platform.
- Accessible to Independent Landlords and Small Operators: The service fits teams leasing a few units at a time.
- ResidentScore Designed Specifically for Rental Risk: The score targets eviction and rental outcomes, not general credit.
- Renter-Paid Option Available to Reduce Operator Cost: Applicants can cover the screening fee instead of the landlord.
- Fast Same-Day Turnaround without Platform Dependency: Most reports arrive the same day with nothing to install.
Where SmartMove Falls Short
- Score and Report without an Automatic Leasing Decision: The output stops at data, and the decision stays manual.
- Not Built for High-Volume or Multi-Site Portfolio Operations: Throughput and reporting do not fit large portfolios.
- No Native PMS Integration or Workflow Automation: Reports live outside any leasing system.
- Limited Income and Identity Verification Depth: Income and identity checks are shallower than a decisioning stack.
- No Feedback Loop from Approved Resident Performance: Criteria never learn from real post-lease results.
Choosing Between Yardi Screening and SmartMove
The right platform depends less on data quality and more on how your team leases and how many units you screen.
Already Running on Yardi Voyager or RentCafe
If your team already operates inside Yardi, the screening is the low-friction choice because it lives in the workflow you use every day. There is no second tool to buy.
Independent Landlords and Small Portfolio Operators
For landlords who screen a handful of applicants a year, SmartMove fits the pattern. There is no subscription, pricing is per report, and the renter-paid option keeps the cost off your books.
Operations Needing Income Verification and Identity Checks Built In
Yardi is the stronger option here, with Nova Credit income verification, Cash Atlas cash-flow underwriting, and biometric identity matching in the report. It still returns a recommendation rather than a decision, so the final call remains manual.
Teams without a PMS Needing Quick Standalone Access
SmartMove wins for teams that want to screen without adopting a platform. Signup takes minutes, most reports come back the same day, and there is no software dependency.
Whichever fits, both platforms stop at the same line. They hand a score or a recommendation to a person, who still makes the leasing decision.
Yardi Screening vs SmartMove: What Neither Platform Resolves
Both platforms leave the same four gaps, and they widen as application volume grows. The table shows where each one stops and why it matters.
| Gap |
What Yardi Does |
What SmartMove Does |
Why It Matters |
| 1. Recommendations and Scores Still Require a Human Decision |
Returns a recommendation |
Returns a score and report |
The leasing decision still sits with staff, so speed and consistency depend on people |
| 2. Volume and Consistency Suffer without Automatic Decisioning |
Automates recommendations, not the decision |
Manual, one report at a time |
Throughput caps at how fast people review, and criteria drift between reviewers |
| 3. Fraud Detection Stops at the Report Stage |
SSN, CPN, and biometric checks in the report |
Identity check within the report |
Neither cross-references signals across a broader network, so fabricated documents can pass |
| 4. Screening Criteria Cannot Learn from Real Post-Lease Outcomes |
No post-lease feedback loop |
No post-lease feedback loop |
Criteria never tighten based on which approved residents actually paid |
How Findigs Moves Past Screening Into Decisioning
Findigs is the residential leasing decisioning platform for property managers, and it closes the gaps that screening alone leaves open. Instead of returning a score or a recommendation, it returns an automatic yes or no on every application, with screening, underwriting, and the final decision running on one platform.
- Every Application Gets an Automatic Yes or No: Findigs decides rather than advises. DecisionAssist removes the manual review queue and returns a clear answer on each file.
- Screening, Underwriting, and the Final Decision on One Platform: The three layers run together and end in a decision, so no file hands back to a reviewer mid-process.
- Cross-Network Fraud Detection Across a 400K+ Unit Network: Signals are compared across a 400K+ unit network, which catches fabricated documents and synthetic identities that a single report cannot see.
- Policy That Tightens with Every Completed Lease: Criteria learn from post-lease outcomes, so the policy sharpens as more residents pay or default. That is the feedback loop neither Yardi nor SmartMove has.
- A Contractual Fraud Guarantee Neither Yardi nor SmartMove Offers: Findigs stands behind its decisions with a contractual fraud guarantee, a commitment no screening report carries.
- Median Decision Time of 3.4 Hours from Application to Answer: The platform reaches a median decision time of 3.4 hours, fast enough to keep qualified applicants from walking away.
Those mechanics connect directly to revenue quality. Automatic decisions fill more units, and stronger fraud defense with post-lease learning means operators collect more of what they lease, cutting bad debt by up to 60%. Both outcomes lift Net Operating Income rather than only trimming leasing work.
Conclusion
Yardi Resident Screening and TransUnion SmartMove both do the job they were built for. Yardi fits teams that already run on Voyager and want screening built into the workflow they use every day. SmartMove fits independent landlords and small operators who want a quick, reliable report with no software commitment.
Both, though, stop at a recommendation or a score and hand the final leasing decision back to the operator. Findigs moves past that line by deciding on every application, which fills more units and helps operators collect more of what they lease, lifting Net Operating Income rather than only saving time. And every decision is backed by a contractual fraud guarantee, the only one in the category.