A decision you can explain
Findigs returns a decision on every rental application, not a score. Your written policy makes the call, and every decision traces back to its inputs.
A score nobody can explain is a liability
Many AI screening tools return a risk score that nobody on your team can explain. That holds until a decision is challenged. Screening companies have paid to settle claims over their scores and records, and the operator still owns the decision.
Every decision shows its work
Your policy, applied the same way every time
You set the criteria: income, credit, rental history. Findigs applies the same written rules to every applicant at every property, so two matching files get the same answer.
A record behind every decision
Every decision documents the policy in force, the inputs considered and the decision path for that application. Declines run through the FCRA adverse action process.
See how your own policy performs
Findigs shows how residents your policy approved actually pay, on your own data. You decide what to change.
Precise, and we can show our work
- underwriting error rate, vs. a 19.8% baseline
- 0.65%underwriting error rate, vs. a 19.8% baseline
- fewer evictions
- up to 80%fewer evictions
- lower delinquency
- 90%lower delinquency
For the people who answer for the decision
Compliance and legal
You need to show how any decision was made, on request.
Operations leaders
You want automated decisions without a model you can't explain.
Owners and asset managers
You need screening decisions that hold up when someone asks why.
Questions about explainable AI tenant screening
What is explainable AI tenant screening?
Screening where every decision can be traced to the rules and data behind it. Each one traces back to the criteria and inputs considered, not just a number.
Does AI make the final decision?
No. Your written policy does. AI verifies identity, income and documents, and Findigs applies your criteria to the result.
Why does explainability matter for fair housing?
A decision you can't explain is hard to defend. In 2024, SafeRent Solutions agreed to a $2.275M settlement in a case over its screening score. In 2023, TransUnion's rental screening business paid $15M to settle FTC and CFPB claims over its rental reports. See fair housing compliance.
How is a decision different from a screening score?
A score ranks applicants and leaves the call to your team. Findigs returns the call itself: yes, no or conditional approval, traced to its inputs. See AI tenant screening.
Continue exploring Findigs
Decisioning
One decision on every application, traced to your policy.
Fair housing compliance
The same criteria for every applicant, with a record to show it.
When AI screening fails, operators pay the price
Why the operator owns the decision, whoever built the model.
Make every decision one you can explain
See how every Findigs decision traces back to its inputs.
